You are here

قراءة كتاب Coyotes in Their Economic Relations

تنويه: تعرض هنا نبذة من اول ١٠ صفحات فقط من الكتاب الالكتروني، لقراءة الكتاب كاملا اضغط على الزر “اشتر الآن"

‏اللغة: English
Coyotes in Their Economic Relations

Coyotes in Their Economic Relations

تقييمك:
0
No votes yet
دار النشر: Project Gutenberg
الصفحة رقم: 3

when these natural resources of the country fail, sheep and young calves furnish abundant food.

In nearly all the Western States the efforts of ranchmen to destroy the coyote have been supplemented by laws authorizing the payment of bounties from public funds. Some of these laws have been in operation for a score of years or even more and, except locally, no diminution in the general numbers of the animals has resulted. In some parts of Mexico where the natives have for many years practiced systematic poisoning, the coyote is becoming rare, but in most sections of its range it is either increasing or no substantial decrease has been observed.

COYOTES IN KANSAS.

The State of Kansas, where settlements are comparatively old and where man's warfare against the coyote has been long continued, affords an excellent illustration of the animal's ability to maintain its numbers under seemingly adverse circumstances. Most of the counties of the State have for many years paid bounties for killing coyotes, and conditions have been reached where there is little fluctuation in the total amount paid from year to year. The returns of the animals killed for the fiscal twelve months from July 1, 1903, to June 30, 1904, show that nearly 20,000 scalps were presented for bounty in the State.

The following is a table, by counties, of the number of coyotes on which bounties were paid during the year above specified. Of the 11 missing counties, 10—Cherokee. Comanche. Finney. Grant, Haskell, Kearney, Morton, Seward, Stevens, and Wyandotte—paid no bounties, and 1, Doniphan, made no report. The bounty in all cases is $1 for each animal killed.

Number of coyotes on which bounties were paid in Kansas
from July 1, 1903, to June 30. 1904.

County. Number
of coyotes.
County. Number
of coyotes.
County. Number
of coyotes.
Allen 73 Harper 44 Phillips 400
Anderson 129 Harvey 99 Pottawatomie 329
Atchison 48 Hodgeman 74 Pratt 242
Barber 633 Jackson 86 Rawlins 223
Barton 109 Jefferson 94 Reno 184
Bourbon 157 Jewell 106 Republic 52
Brown 70 Johnson 62 Rice 90
Butler 186 Kingman 257 Riley 206
Chase 343 Kiowa 477 Rooks 280
Chautauqua 451 Labette 137 Rush 144
Cheyenne 585 Lane 164 Russell 258
Clark 460 Leavenworth 56 Saline 186
Clay 104 Lincoln 105 Scott 193
Cloud 42 Linn 175 Sedgwick 223
Coffey 159 Logan 329 Shawnee 69
Cowley 325 Lyon 197 Sheridan 306
Crawford 51 Marion 166 Sherman 291
Decatur 240 Marshall 304 Smith 133
Dickinson 145 McPherson 210 Stafford 142
Douglas 99 Meade 224 Stanton 188
Edwards 290 Miami 96 Sumner 401
Elk 212 Mitchell 100 Thomas 185
Ellis 248 Montgomery 148 Trego 430
Ellsworth 193 Morris 176 Wabaunsee 170
Ford 500 Nemaha 58 Wallace 259
Franklin 152 Neosho 98 Washington 200
Geary 102 Ness 273 Wichita 307
Gove 355 Norton 227 Wilson 210
Graham 293 Osage 173 Woodson 115
Greeley[C] 117 Osborne 248
Greenwood 336 Ottawa 61 Total 19,152
Hamilton 275 Pawnee 230

[C] six months.

The experience in Kansas is not exceptional. It may be duplicated in a dozen other Western States and in some of the British provinces. It is probable

Pages